Re: Another editorial change - objections anyone?

> On Aug 31, 2017, at 5:47 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi TPWG Team,
> 
> Rob suggested the following editorial change to clarify the spec before
> CR. The proposal removes and compresses section 10.1 and adds this
> compressed text to Section 5.2. I am fine with introducing this
> editorial change.
> 
> Does anyone have any objections? If not, I would ask Roy to update
> before submission.

I object. Section 10.1 explains the rationale for section 4 (not 5.2).
Rewriting the note in that way entirely changes its meaning.
In any case, the protocol does have requirements on user agents
that apply absent an explicit preference by a user.  Failing to
adhere to those requirements will harm users *outside* the EU.

....Roy

Received on Thursday, 31 August 2017 17:08:33 UTC