Re: Revised Charter Proposal - Feedback by Oct 26

I am OK with this roughly; I think it needs word-smithing and so on.

The only thing I would point out is that we should indicate that though we are in maintenance mode on TCS, if it gets adoption/traction, we have no objection to progressing it to Recommendation; it’s just not a focus of our work.


> On Oct 20, 2016, at 15:53 , Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> 
> enclosed is the charter V05 that has been revised based on the feedback
> in our call.
> 
> Changes:
> - I added an outline describing the current content of the TPE.
> - I redefined goals and added two stretch goals. The intuition is that
> we want to publish TPE in August for adoption _in any case_ (no stalling
> by the chairs in 2017 ;-).
>  The more we can align with the EU and demonstrate benefits, the
> better. But we want to publish what we have nevertheless to e.g, allow
> user agents to finalize their implementation.
> - I state that we put the TCS into "maintenance mode". This means that
> we continue collecting feedback but that we do not plan to push TCS to
> recommendation unless there are stronger signs of adoption.
> 
> Any further feedback is welcome. If there are no substantiated
> objections, I would submit the revision to W3C for processing next
> Wednesday (Oct 26)
> 
> 
> Regards.
> matthias
> <Tracking Protection Working Group Charter-v05-2016-10-20.docx><Tracking Protection Working Group Charter-v05-2016-10-20-ChangeHighlighted.pdf>

Dave Singer

singer@mac.com

Received on Monday, 24 October 2016 10:50:52 UTC