Re: TPWG Charter

Hi TPWG participants,

Seeing limited conversation here, and no input from adopters of the
technology, I lean toward not rechartering the group at this time,
while continuing to track implementation and adoption.

We can keep using the public-tracking mailing list and wikis, under the
auspices of the Privacy Interest Group (PING, join for broader
discussion, if you like, at https://www.w3.org/Privacy/).

The CR documents we published will of course remain available for
reference, implementation, and use:
 TPE: https://www.w3.org/TR/tracking-dnt/
 TCS: https://www.w3.org/TR/tracking-compliance/

If interest in DNT picks up, we can reopen the Working Group to complete
the interop testing and editing necessary to take the specs forward to
Recommendation.

How does that sound?

--Wendy

On 07/01/2016 07:39 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> 
> 
> thanks for the positive responses. It is a good point that people who
> want to implement DNT better get guidance to do so in an interoperable way.
> 
> I would also like to hear the opposite opinions: Are there objections to
> extending the charter and finalizing the documents?
> Is there a downside to extending the charter, reviewing implementations,
> and publishing a final recommendation?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> matthias
> Am 01.07.2016 00:10, schrieb Craig Spiezle:
>> I third it.  As noted we are seeing an uptake of sites disclosing if they Honor DNT and a renewed interest among publishers.   Honoring Do Not track is much suddenly become more attractive then Ad blockers.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rob van Eijk [mailto:rob@blaeu.com] 
>> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 11:14 AM
>> To: Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
>> Cc: public-tracking@w3.org; 'Wendy Seltzer' <wseltzer@w3.org>
>> Subject: Re: TPWG Charter
>>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I second a request to extend the charter. Now that implementers and testers have picked up DNT, it is time to further explore use cases that we may have overlooked.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Rob van Eijk
>>
>> Mike O'Neill schreef op 2016-06-30 19:57:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> With the tightening of the requirement for consent, the right to 
>>> object, right to amend/modify/erase driven by the GDPR in Europe and 
>>> the (initially Transatlantic) PrivacyShield, makes it advisable that 
>>> the charter for this group be extended for at least another year. The 
>>> building-blocks in the TPE, for example the Tracking Status Resource, 
>>> support many of these requirements, and can clearly be enhanced to 
>>> support the others, and this WG is the obvious place where these can 
>>> be discussed and hopefully standardised.
>>>
>>> The rising popularity of Ad Blockers and other Content Blocking 
>>> applications, which can be destructive in the way they arbitrarily 
>>> inhibit aspects of the web platform, also point to the need for 
>>> protocol elements that can communicate user preferences, and the TPE 
>>> or something similar to it would help with this.
>>>
>>> The TPE has been implemented on several clients and servers as 
>>> described in the Implementation Report 
>>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/TPE_Implementation_Report
>>>
>>> The Tracking Exception API has been supported natively and in user 
>>> agent extensions, and has been supported by thousands of sites, 
>>> including those run by major consumer brand companies, in most 
>>> European countries since 2013. A number of these sites are extending 
>>> their support for the TPE protocol elements in the near future.
>>>
>>> I hope the W3C recognises this and extends the group charter for 
>>> another year.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mike O'Neill
>>> Technical Director
>>> Baycloud Systems
>>> Oxford Centre for Innovation
>>> New Road
>>> Oxford
>>> OX1 1BY
>>> Tel. 01865 735619
>>> Fax: 01865 261401
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office)
Policy Counsel and Domain Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
https://wendy.seltzer.org/        +1.617.863.0613 (mobile)

Received on Friday, 15 July 2016 16:05:07 UTC