- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 09:17:56 -0800
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: Tracking Protection Working Group <public-tracking@w3.org>
Roy, thanks two comments, one minor, one less so. >> >> >> 3.3.1.1 No Secondary Uses >> >> A party MUST NOT use data collected for permitted uses for purposes other >> than the permitted uses for which each datum was permitted to be >> collected. > > Yikes. How about: > > A party MUST NOT use data collected for permitted uses for purposes > other than those permitted uses. A party MUST NOT use data that was collected for a permitted use, for any purpose other than the permitted use. (minor, I think it’s better in the singular.) >> >> 7. Legal Compliance >> >> Notwithstanding anything in this recommendation, a party MAY collect, use, >> and share data required to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and >> judicial processes. > > I still think this section is silly, but *shrug* ... Normally, I would > expect such a party to be non-compliant due to powers that be, rather > than compliant by escape clause. > I totally agree. I think the server should indicate “I cannot comply because of a law, regulation, or judicial process”. (Now, the legal compulsion may also say that they have to lie to users and claim that they are complying, but I see no reason why we should bless such deception.) David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 4 March 2015 17:18:26 UTC