- From: Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 19:13:30 +0100
- To: "'Carl Cargill'" <cargill@adobe.com>, <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0f9601d0d52a$98304f70$c890ee50$@baycloud.com>
Hi Carl, Is there a template to use for an implementation report. I can do a server-side one. Mike From: Carl Cargill [mailto:cargill@adobe.com] Sent: 12 August 2015 18:13 To: public-tracking@w3.org Subject: FW: Progression of TPE to CR All – Based on conversation with editors, we believe these typical CR exit criteria should apply to the TPE Candidate Recommendation that we expect to publish after a Director decision: * Multiple (at least two), interoperable implementations of each feature, excepting features marked at risk A three-month minimum for CR is appropriate. The actual length of the Candidate Recommendation phase will of course depend on the actual work of implementing TPE features and testing/documentation in an implementation report. We anticipate that to depend more on server-side implementation and estimate a range of 3 to 6 months. Let us know of any objections to these conditions before we follow up with the Director regarding transition and issuing a Call for Implementations. For the Chairs Carl Cargill Carl Cargill Principal Scientist, Standards Adobe Systems Cargill@adobe.com <mailto:Cargill@adobe.com> Office: +1 541 488 0040 Mobile: +1 650 759 9803 @AdobeStandards http://blogs.adobe.com/standards
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2015 18:14:04 UTC