- From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 10:09:52 +0200
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: "Mike O'Neill" <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>, "'Tracking Protection Working Group'" <public-tracking@w3.org>
> If you want to suggest that the UGE APIs contain an expiration > parameter, > then now is the time to do so. I think that should be considered a > separate > issue, since the WP comments were intending a global default. I suggest the UGE APIs to contain an expiration parameter instead of a global default. I agree this should be a seperate issue. The expiration parameter is in line with what has been expressed in the letter from WP29 to the working group. mvg::Rob Roy T. Fielding schreef op 2014-09-22 23:17: > On Sep 22, 2014, at 12:42 PM, Mike O'Neill wrote: >> A sunset period for tracking consent has been called for by the DPAs >> in Europe with the CNIL specifying no more than 13 months. Some >> responsible companies may want it to default to less than that, or >> give the user an option. >> >> There is no reason that the API could not be extended to support that >> with an expiry/max-age parameter as in cookies. Otherwise it would be >> left to the user agents to come up with arbitrary defaults. > > That would be a technical change to the API to be set by each server, > not > a global default expiration of 13 months (an entirely arbitrary > number). > > If you want to suggest that the UGE APIs contain an expiration > parameter, > then now is the time to do so. I think that should be considered a > separate > issue, since the WP comments were intending a global default. > > ....Roy
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 08:10:29 UTC