> I think we need to step back and consider the problem in general. We have a server that wants to support DNT but is, in fact, relaying the request to others. This is a 1:N gateway. It is not too late for us to introduce a TSV that says "I am a 1:N gateway, here is information about me and here is information about my requirements on downstream recipients; I promise to relay the DNT signal to those recipients and will relay the final recipient's Tk response to the current request." Roy, The Ad-exchange is sharing the data with third parties and therefore does not respect the DNT signal in the first place. If an Ad-exchange plans to share data about a transaction with a set of third parties it should send a disregard response. I don't see how the "I'm a 1:N gateway" would not be interpreted as "I'm sharing data related to this transaction". Vincent
Received on Friday, 31 October 2014 20:13:34 UTC