Re: Agenda for October 22 TPWG call

My apologies, I am at an mpeg meeting this week

On Oct 22, 2014, at 0:54 , Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org> wrote:

> [Apologies for the delay in sending this out; that was my (Nick) fault, not the chairs.]
> 
> Similar agenda to last week. Have we gotten to resolution via mailing list discussion on a few of these?
> 
> Note: we won't have a call on October 29th (many chairs/participants are occupied at TPAC).
> 
> Thanks,
> Nick (for the co-chairs)
> 
> --- Issues for this Call ---
> 
> 1. TPE Last Call Comments
> 
> We'll look through additional issues and some proposed responses.
> 
> ISSUE-262: guidance regarding server responses and timing
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/262
> 
> ISSUE-266: regarding expiration of user-granted exceptions: do we have agreement?
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/266

sounds like we need a new bag element for both calls with an optional expiry time/duration.  what is the best practice for expressing that?

> 
> 2. Compliance issues
> 
> Security and auditing
> ISSUE-24: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Security
> 
> ISSUE-235: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Remove_auditable_security_requirement
> Per mailing list discussion, if anyone can't live with removing the sentence in question, speak up.
> 
> ISSUE-148: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_DNT_0
> 
> ISSUE-203: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Tracking_Third_Party_Compliance
> 
> 3. AOB

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2014 08:06:32 UTC