- From: Shane M Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:48:52 +0000
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Tracking Protection Working Group <public-tracking@w3.org>
Removing the option for web-wide exceptions is a non-starter as that's the only tool expected to be used by 3rd parties that are most impacted by this standard. - Shane -----Original Message----- From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 10:09 AM To: Tracking Protection Working Group Subject: Re: tracking-ISSUE-266: automatic expiration of a tracking preference exception via API parameter [TPE Last Call] I think that this is a problem most conspicuously for web-wide exceptions, and they effectively emulate the behavior of cookies but in another way. (Site-wide exceptions and cookies are not similar.) The really broken scenario is where the site has a web-wide exception that needs to expire for some reason, and the exceptions API doesn't support expiry. To remember the expiry, the site sets an expiring cookie, and questions or disregards the exception if either it or the cookie is missing. If the site's web-wide resource is non-scripted it is in no position to do anything about confirmation, re-requesting, checking etc. unless the user visits the site itself again. Issues: * why not use just the cookie? * if the cookie is missing but the exception is present, which of the following occurred? a) the user deleted cookies but the expiry time is not yet reached b) the cookie expired c) the user set their general preference to DNT:0 I don't think the site can tell. I therefore think that we should either 1] add an expiry parameter to both exception-setting APIs (for regularity, though only the web-wide one is problematic) OR 2] delete web-wide exceptions, since they are simply replicating cookies Which do people prefer? David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2014 17:50:44 UTC