- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:38:25 +0200
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: Tracking Protection Working Group <public-tracking@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 7:35 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > We did discuss what the JS property should return, and Roy adjusted it to be null-able, and the sense was, I think that it should be documented as returning whatever the UA would send as the DNT header value. If the UA makes up an extension after the 1 or 0, it should include that, so it’s not an enum. You could say that for every enum value there is. If people start emitting proprietary values without standardization and that is fine with you, I'm not sure what the point of standardizing this is in the first place. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 17:38:52 UTC