W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2014

Re: Use of the definition of "tracking" in compliance (ISSUE-203)

From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:26:38 +0200
To: Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
Message-ID: <4fac74e20b48004e129c574c5a85bc59@xs4all.nl>
I have a clarifying question to the group:

Would the current text/definitions consider e.g. Google Display Network 
as 1 context?

Rob


Justin Brookman schreef op 2014-09-25 00:24:
> We spent much of today’s call on one of the few remaining open issues
> on the compliance document:  how to use the definition of tracking in
> the document.  I think we are fairly closely aligned on desired
> outcomes — but there is a difference on how to express that in the
> document.
> 
> Several working group members requested more time to review the
> options.  On the call today, we winnowed the options from four to two,
> though if someone wants to argue for one of the discarded options (or
> another), please do so!
> 
> The updated wiki is here:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Tracking_Third_Party_Compliance
> 
> On next week’s call, I will try to identify what (if any) TCS issues I
> think we have left to resolve (we won’t have the TPE editors on the
> call).
> 
> In two weeks’ time, I hope we will proposed resolutions on all
> outstanding TPE Last Call comments.  We will discuss on that week’s
> call, and talk through what is left to do to move to Candidate
> Recommendation on TPE.
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2014 11:27:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:24 UTC