- From: Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:46:14 +0100
- To: "'Nicholas Doty'" <npdoty@w3.org>, "'Tracking Protection Working Group'" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Cc: "Jonathan Mayer" <jmayer@stanford.edu>
- Message-ID: <087501cfe2fe$3b68d3d0$b23a7b70$@baycloud.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The current text talks about a personalised experience but consent may have been given for data collection, e.g. by an analytics provider or for a survey panel, that does not affect content or change the web experience. I agree with Jonathon’s proposal that it should simply indicate consent to the processing explained when a UGE was granted, but this does not cover the general preference case. I would like to propose this as a friendly amendment to his proposal: A DNT: 0 signal in a request indicates a user’s explicit agreement to their personal data being collected and processed as explained at the time consent was given. If the DNT: 0 signal can only indicate a user’s general preference this recommendation places no restriction on the data collected. Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: Nicholas Doty [mailto:npdoty@w3.org] > Sent: 07 October 2014 19:19 > To: Tracking Protection Working Group > Subject: Agenda for October 8 TPWG call > > *** gpg4o | Unknown Signature from 40203EE90BBAB306 1 2 01 1412705969 9 > *** > > Reminder, call for objections on audience measurement closes on Thursday, > October 9. > > Thanks, > Nick (for the chairs) > > AGENDA: > ---------------------------------- > Confirmation of scribe. Volunteers welcome! > Offline-caller-identification. > ---------------------------------- > --- Issues for this Call --- > > 1. TPE Last Call Comments > > We'll look through additional issues and some proposed responses. > > On a previous call, it was mentioned that we might want further comments on > https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/262 - guidance > regarding server responses and timing > > 2. Compliance issues (if we have time) > > ISSUE-203: > http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Tracking_Third_Part > y_Compliance > > Security and auditing > ISSUE-24: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Security > ISSUE-235: > http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Remove_auditable_ > security_requirement > > ISSUE-148: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_DNT_0 > > 3. AOB -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (MingW32) Comment: Using gpg4o v3.3.26.5094 - http://www.gpg4o.com/ Charset: utf-8 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUNUAlAAoJEHMxUy4uXm2J0ScH/0DcV6UcNzEFve2rb/AsUvO2 8HFLcK4/LXq97R0fESy6XuOOLWfJ9rXxJwAO8bXeYH3a75mLI093jY70rTT/p73f nyO1G7g1l69Is/Y1ZtZzzg2jdnxMtGoOP51rR7re3Hvn3HqRGQfiRKppfr+1c/Hd Rcr4Sxp3Mz4LzRnoUUu7hlbyWjV+BXaKQsxc5Ef7qv9hKHGrvHvlvr4oqkgYaV2h PhDlynzbIaeikghlPySDxpllulFiefKO2yMHOvkHMVlCOT07JWQPgZhIMjaBmtBa cHPhKEhz2llZgRAd6A05M3b/ROcDJuqVO9ws6yGUu8gi9/ID2C5+NGDUf4YnzKk= =GtAf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Attachments
- text/html attachment: PGPexch.htm
- application/octet-stream attachment: PGPexch.htm.sig
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 13:47:17 UTC