- From: Ninja Marnau <ninja@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 08:55:07 +0200
- To: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5368874B.8060901@w3.org>
AGENDA: ---------------------------------- 1. Confirmation of scribe. Volunteers welcome! 2. Offline-caller-identification (see end for instructions) ---------------------------------- --- Issues for this Call --- 3. _*Disregard signal*_ ISSUE-207: Conditions for dis-regarding (or not) DNT signals https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/207 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Disregarding May 7: M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus 4. _*Unknowing data collection*_ ISSUE-208: Requirements on unknowing collection, retention and use https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/208 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Unknowing May 7: M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted; Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals 5. *_User agent compliance_* We would like to take up the topic of user agent compliance as a cluster of closely related issues: ISSUE-205: User agent compliance requirements; connections to TPE https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/205 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_User_Agent_Compliance + ISSUE-227: User Agent requirements in UA Compliance vs. Scope section https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/227 + ISSUE-194: How should we ensure consent of users for DNT inputs? https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/194 + ISSUE-172: How should user agents be required to provide information about DNT? https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/172 + ISSUE-132: Should the spec speak to intermediaries or hosting providers to modify any responses/statements about DNT compliance? https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/132 + ISSUE-177: Should we specify compliance requirements for software and hardware other than user agents? For example, is a web server package compliant if it tweaks DNT headers? https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/177 May 7: M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted; Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals 6. _*Geolocation*_ ISSUE-202: Limitations on geolocation by third parties https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/202 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Geolocation May 7: M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All change proposals should be drafted ================ Summary Documentation on Resolving ISSUES ================= PHASES to resolve issues: M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All change proposals should be drafted M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted; Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for objections (2 weeks after M3); Analysis starts M7 (announcement): Results are announced ================ Infrastructure ================= Zakim teleconference bridge: VoIP: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225) IRC Chat: irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org/>, port 6665, #dnt OFFLINE caller identification: If you intend to join the phone call, you must either associate your phone number with your IRC username once you've joined the call (command: "Zakim, [ID] is [name]" e.g., "Zakim, ??P19 is schunter" in my case), or let Nick know your phone number ahead of time. If you are not comfortable with the Zakim IRC syntax for associating your phone number, please email your name and phone number to npdoty@w3.org<mailto:npdoty@w3.org>. We want to reduce (in fact, eliminate) the time spent on the call identifying phone numbers. Note that if your number is not identified and you do not respond to off-the-phone reminders via IRC, you will be dropped from the call.
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 06:55:36 UTC