Re: [ISSUE 97] Consolidated text on link shorteners

Thanks Walter.  If anyone wants to propose a friendly perfecting amendment, please do so to the list today.  Otherwise, we will proceed with a call for objections tomorrow.

On Jul 29, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl> wrote:

> After some back-and-forths off-list we've managed to condense Mike, Nick
> and my proposal to the following:
> 
> Network interactions and subrequests related to a given user action may
> not constitute intentional interaction when, for example, the user is
> unaware or only transiently informed of redirection or framed content.
> 
> See also:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposals_on_link_shorteners_and_ID_providers
> 

Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2014 18:16:28 UTC