- From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 19:47:54 -0800
- To: Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
I am puzzled about your suggestion. We have been focusing on the TPE. I don't understand how the TCS represents any consensus whatsoever.. Whynwould that be a meaningful working draft? On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:04 PM, Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org> wrote: > Following up on this email from Nick last month (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2013Dec/0057.html), our process requires us to publish occasional snapshot working drafts of the specifications we are working on. I think the TPE is currently in flux while we consider the proposed changes that Roy has put into the Editors' Draft (eliminating the dependencies between the specifications). However, the Compliance document (http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html) can be published with the updated definitions that we have agreed upon over the past two months. No one objected to Nick's proposal, so I'll ask him to proceed to update the status of the drafts (see Nick's email for full details).
Received on Friday, 17 January 2014 03:48:35 UTC