Re: Deidentification (ISSUE-188)

On Aug 20, 2014, at 16:57 , Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:

> On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:40 PM, David Singer wrote:
>> de-associated — hah!  I don’t get any useful hits in Google!  would this work for us?
> 
> That's because it is normally "dissociated" or "disassociated".
> 
> *shrug*
> 

that is the usual english term, with perhaps slightly different nuance.  it doesn’t seem to be used in this field either, as far as I can tell

> ....Roy
> 

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Thursday, 21 August 2014 00:03:19 UTC