- From: Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 16:31:23 +0100
- To: <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2014 15:31:58 UTC
Do we need to define noa? Why not just have a sentence in the scope like this: Data is outside the scope of this specification if it cannot be used to infer information about, or otherwise be linked to, a particular consumer, computer, or other device. Or use anonymised which generally means the same thing. We keep de-identified only for permitted use data.
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2014 15:31:58 UTC