W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > August 2014


From: Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 16:31:23 +0100
To: <public-tracking@w3.org>
Cc: "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Message-ID: <000601cfb18b$7b796ec0$726c4c40$@baycloud.com>
Do we need to define noa? Why not just have a sentence in the scope like


Data is outside the scope of this specification if it cannot be used to
infer information about, or otherwise be linked to, a particular consumer,
computer, or other device.


Or use anonymised which generally means the same thing. We keep
de-identified only for permitted use data. 
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2014 15:31:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:40:12 UTC