Re: Party definition, was: Re: proposed short-term changes to TCS (ISSUE-10)

On Sep 23, 2013, at 1:09 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:

> Hi Roy et. al.,
> 
> thanks a lot for starting a discussion on potential change proposals for the party definition. I assume this is meant as input to ISSUE-10: Once we agree what a party is, defining a "first party" should be easier.

No, Matthias, that was in response to the call for editorial changes
sufficient to make an immediate WD publication that actually reflects
the desires of this working group.  Hence, the changes should be made
immediately and a new WD posted, as you said would be done on the call.

....Roy

Received on Monday, 23 September 2013 18:34:08 UTC