- From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 08:44:18 -0700
- To: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
I don't understand why issues that Walter had raised weren't already incorporated in the raised issues. On Sep 20, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org> wrote: > Hi Walter, > > > thanks a lot for re-sending your mail. > > I agree with you that the points you are raised are fundamental, i.e., to address those I expect more than editorial changes to the drafts. > > As a consequence, you should follow the guidelines in our plan to either attach it to an existing issue or translate them one-by-one into new issues. Similarily, for each issue, it is important that you propose text how you could resolve your issues (if you cannot propose a solution, resolving them will be hard for the team). > > Non-normative reminders (details are in the plan): > - The deadline for editorial changes for our next release is today (but may be sent until Sunday) > - The deadline for creating new issues is October 02 (with at least one proposed text) > - New text proposals are appreciated ASAP but I will send additional calls for text proposals for each issue. > > > Regards, > matthias > > > > > On 20/09/2013 21:01, Walter van Holst wrote: >> Dear Workgroup members, >> >> Last call Matthias requested for comments on the compliance spec (at >> least, that was my understanding of the challenging audio quality during >> the call, the minutes do not clarify this). >> >> Looking at it again, it made me feel that none of the issues raised by >> me in May have been addressed so far in any way. See for a list of those >> issues the attached mail to this list from back then. >> >> Regarding the TPE itself, as far as I am concerned there is little in >> there that would prevent us from going forward, thanks to both David >> Singer and Roy Fielding. The issue is what it all means from a >> compliance perspective and the fact that the compliance spec has >> progressed little since May does not instill me with confidence about >> getting anywhere near something meaningful. >> >> Regards, >> >> Walter >
Received on Saturday, 21 September 2013 15:44:46 UTC