- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 22:49:57 +0200
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>
* Jeff Jaffe wrote: >On 9/17/2013 3:14 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >> Furthermore, the Working Group is required to formally address comments >> like those described above in a timely manner and must attempt to >> satisfy the reviewer. But the proposed plan does not make clear that it >> will formally address them prior to making a Last Call announcement, and >> likely make substantive changes to the document in response, even though >> none of the rules imposed on group participants have been followed. > >These issues would be treated as post-Last Call issues, but they would >still need to be addressed before going to a Recommendation. You mean pre-Last Call, if the Working Group decides to address them by making changes that are not minor changes like "clarifications, bug fixes, editorial repairs, and minor error corrections". Here: A technical report is returned to a Working Group for further work in either of the following situations: 1. The Working Group makes substantive changes to the technical report at any time after a Last Call announcement and prior to Publication as a Recommendation, except when the changes involve the removal of features at risk identified in a Call for Implementations. In the case of substantive changes, the Working Group MUST republish the technical report as a Working Draft. 2. The Director requires the Working Group to address important issues raised during a review or as the result of implementation experience. In this case, Director MAY request that the Working Group republish the technical report as a Working Draft, even if the Working Group has not made substantive changes. The Director MUST inform the Advisory Committee and group Chairs when a technical report has been returned to a Working Group for further work. After republication as a Working Draft, the next forward step available to the Working Group is a Last Call announcement. The Last Call announcement MAY occur at the same time as the publication of the Working Draft. As per <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/process.html#return-to-wg>. By the way, could you point me to the document the Working Group has published under the provisions of Process section 6.2.7 3rd paragraph? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2013 20:50:27 UTC