W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Proposed changes to the plan

From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:43:19 +0100
Message-ID: <5232FA57.6010501@schunter.org>
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Hi Ninja,


thanks for the feedback.

Yes: "no text" (with appropriate argument) is a sound change proposal to 
resolve an issue.

What is important that "no text" is documented as one alternative change 
proposal within the wiki.
If there is only one change proposal (e.g. an issue only having the "no 
text" resultion), the chairs may interpret this as this single proposal 
that has consensus.
However, if there is some text and "no text" as an alternative, we need 
to actually jointly decide among those options.


Regards,
matthias



On 13/09/2013 11:54, Ninja Marnau wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> just a clarification question regarding the "single text rule": I guess
> it will not be considered a single text, if we have one text proposal
> and the proposal to not include this text.
>
> Do we specifically need to write it to the mailing list, if we object to
> include a proposed text and rather have the spec stay silent on the
> issue? This would mean for each text proposal that silence is considered
> agreement/consensus to include the text - is this what you are suggesting?
>
> Ninja
>
> Am 13.09.2013 11:30, schrieb Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation):
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I had some ideas how to further improve the plan by adding the following
>> rules.
>> Feedback is welcome!
>>
>> Regards,
>> matthias
>>
>> -----------
>> - Single text rule: If there is only one proposed text/resolution by end
>> of month, the chairs may pick this text as our consensus for an issue.
>>
>> - Close in writing: Before closing an issue, a reminder (e.g., the batch
>> closing emails used in the past) is sent to our mailing list.
>>    (Between this email and the closing, there are at least 14 calendar
>> days for review)
>>
>> - Each substantial change proposal must point to an open issue it tries
>> to resolve.
>>
>> - Issues must have one change proposal; issues that have no single
>> change proposal (or otherwise do not satisfy the requirements put
>> forward) will be closed
>>    shortly after October 02.
>>
>>
>>
Received on Friday, 13 September 2013 11:43:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:18 UTC