- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 00:19:31 +0200
- To: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 30 June 2013 22:19:32 UTC
Incorporated here: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Principles_for_Permitted_Uses Thanks, Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler) On 2013-06-26, at 09:00 +0200, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu> wrote: > I would propose we tighten up the minimization language and add examples. In particular, I would change "reasonably necessary" to "strictly necessary," and add these examples: >> Allowed Example: A third-party advertising network uses a minimal set of deidentified data to frequency cap advertisements. >> >> Disallowed Example: A third-party analytics service generates public reports about aggregate page impressions. It retains full protocol logs for two weeks, even though it has no need for them. >
Received on Sunday, 30 June 2013 22:19:32 UTC