- From: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:29:04 -0400
- To: "Dobbs, Brooks" <Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com>, Alex Fowler <afowler@mozilla.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CDF30774.34659%achapell@chapellassociates.com>
Thanks Brooks. Any objections to this language? Nick, has this language been posted to the Wiki? Alan From: "Dobbs, Brooks" <Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com> Date: Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:44 PM To: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>, Alex Fowler <afowler@mozilla.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org> Subject: Re: June Draft - Proposal for User Agent Compliance Resent-From: <public-tracking@w3.org> Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:45:13 +0000 > Alan, > > This is actually an important point. We have been operating under an > assumption that tracking could only occur by a "website", but really tracking > could just as easily (perhaps even more easily) occur through a user agent. > It may be the case that this is not in fact widely occurring today, but it > would seem very prudent to allow for this possibility particularly considering > the potential sea change DNT is envisioned to have. > > -Brooks > > > -- > > Brooks Dobbs, CIPP | Chief Privacy Officer |KBM Group | Part of the Wunderman > Network > (Tel) 678 580 2683 | (Mob) 678 492 1662 | kbmg.com > brooks.dobbs@kbmg.com > > > > This email including attachments may contain confidential information. If > you are not the intended recipient, > do not copy, distribute or act on it. Instead, notify the sender immediately > and delete the message. > > From: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com> > Date: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 1:36 PM > To: Alex Fowler <afowler@mozilla.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" > <public-tracking@w3.org> > Subject: Re: June Draft - Proposal for User Agent Compliance > Resent-From: <public-tracking@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 1:36 PM > > Sure.. In reviewing the June draft with colleagues, it occurred to me that > some User Agents technically speaking could engage in tracking. My sense > is that it is implicit that User agents would fall under the definition of > third party under this spec and therefore would be subject to certain > requirements. My goal was to make that more explicit. It may not be a big deal > as both the DAA Code and the FTC consent order in the Sears case are generally > in line with my proposed language. > > I'm open to wording suggestions, or a debate on the merits. > > Thanks, > > Alan > > From: Alex Fowler <afowler@mozilla.com> > Date: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 1:26 PM > To: <public-tracking@w3.org> > Subject: Re: June Draft - Proposal for User Agent Compliance > Resent-From: <public-tracking@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:26:49 +0000 > >> Alan - >> >> I'm not sure I understand the intent of this proposed addition, Alan. Can you >> provide further info on what this means? My apologies if this is connected to >> a previous discussion that I missed. >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >> >> On 6/26/13 8:49 AM, Alan Chapell wrote: >>> I propose adding the following: >>> >>> A user agent MUST NOT track information related to the network interaction >>> outside of the [Permitted Uses] and any explicitly-granted exceptions >>> without consent. >>> >>> Alan >>
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image_36_.png
Received on Friday, 28 June 2013 13:29:44 UTC