Re: June change proposal: non-normative text for User Agent Compliance

Hi Brooks,

Thanks for the friendly amendment -- I agree that this is better.

Dan

On 06/26/2013 06:23 AM, Dobbs, Brooks wrote:
> Dan, 
>
> Should we be a little more clear on our syntax here?  Without commenting
> on substance, shouldn't this read:
>
>
> "Example: A browser which has a first-run option that forces a user to
> choose between DNT: 1, DNT: 0, or keeping DNT unset, would be considered
> compliant to the DNT standard, as signals sent out based on this
> implementation reflect the user's affirmative DNT choice."
>
>
> DNT is "enabled" in either case (0|1).
>
> -Brooks
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 15:59:48 UTC