Chris, I'm confused here. All this says, as I understand it, is that 1st parties can choose to follow more privacy friendly practices if they choose. Seems to me that might mean some sites would compete around privacy issues. What's wrong with that? Are you suggesting that all 1st parties must only meet the minimum first party requirements and nothing more? Best. John On Jun 26, 2013, at 6:46 AM, Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com> wrote: > Chris – can you help me understand what you mean by tiers of compliance for first parties? > > From: Chris Pedigo <CPedigo@online-publishers.org> > Date: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 9:39 AM > To: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org> > Subject: June Draft - Change Proposal to First Party Compliance > Resent-From: <public-tracking@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:40:27 +0000 > >> In Section 4, I propose to strike the last sentence – “First parties MAY elect to follow third party practices.” >> >> This sentence is obvious and unnecessary. I fear that it would be used by some to create tiers of compliance for first parties. >> >> Chris Pedigo >> VP, Government Affairs >> Online Publishers Association >> (202) 744-2967 >>
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 13:53:23 UTC