- From: Dan Auerbach <dan@eff.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:22:30 -0700
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
I was actually unsure about whether there was a vote on Peter's proposal since my call was flaky, and so glad the question was asked, and genuinely curious what the outcome of that vote would be. Even though I don't think the voting would be likely to align with my preferred approach, it's nice to get a sense of what folks in the group think. That said, when there are more than 2 possibilities on the table and with a group this size, we are likely to run up against Arrow's impossibility theorem (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow%27s_impossibility_theorem) when trying to rank them for the group. On 06/19/2013 12:28 PM, David Singer wrote: > On Jun 19, 2013, at 11:16 , Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu> wrote: > >> Given that context, I want us to be clear: This new process is not a consensus decision. This new process has not in any way been ratified by the group. > Surprisingly, nor has your position as a chair. > > Please tell us what *your* *specific* problems are. You continue to speak vaguely and globally and from a position of an authority you don't have. > > David Singer > Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. > > >
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 16:23:07 UTC