- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:02:10 -0700
- To: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org Mailing List" <public-tracking@w3.org>
On Jun 17, 2013, at 16:59 , Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com> wrote: > David, I think there's significant disagreement whether a DNT standard > should solely focus on Third Parties. That may be true, but I am making a different, and simpler point. What we want you to do when do-not-track is requested, is to stop tracking (this is almost a 'well, duh'). We don't actually *say* that. At the moment, that restriction belongs on third parties (modulo the discussion you want to have). The third party section should start by saying this… > > > > > > On 6/17/13 7:45 PM, "David Singer" <singer@apple.com> wrote: > >> Section 5: >> >> It seems that we should use the defined term, and 3rd parties should be >> barred from collecting or retaining 'tracking' information. That's >> basically what we're trying to do in DNT (limit 3rd parties' tracking) >> but we don't actually say it :-( >> >> >> David Singer >> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. >> >> >> > > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 00:02:37 UTC