Matthias,
We also need ID cookies, but we need them for many reasons, including
auditing frequency capping compliance and reporting on frequency, not just
for detecting OOBC. By the way, I would not call the short retention a
"permitted use"; it is a "permitted retention" only. No "use" of the data
is granted by this section.
--ronan
On Thursday, June 13, 2013, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
> Hi Ronan,
>
> Quick question: Do you only need a change in collection/retention time to
> 48h
> or would you also require to set a ID cookie?
> (i.e., loosely speaking "acting like DNT;0" for 48h and then cleaning up)?
>
> In the latter case (also 48h permission to set cookies), I would need to
> change the proposed text for this permitted use.
>
>