- From: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:47:01 -0400
- To: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>, Chris Mejia <chris.mejia@iab.net>
- CC: W3C DNT Working Group Mailing List <public-tracking@w3.org>, Mike Zaneis <mike@iab.net>, Nick Nicholas Doty - W3C <npdoty@w3.org>, Lou Mastria - DAA <lou@aboutads.info>, Marc Groman - NAI <mgroman@networkadvertising.org>
- Message-ID: <CDDE1DFE.330A3%achapell@chapellassociates.com>
I believe that IE10 (to the extent that it is default set to on) would violate the language re: Action-231, issue-153 we just discussed. From: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu> Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:41 PM To: Chris Mejia <chris.mejia@iab.net> Cc: W3C DNT Working Group Mailing List <public-tracking@w3.org>, Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>, Mike Zaneis <mike@iab.net>, Nick Nicholas Doty - W3C <npdoty@w3.org>, Lou Mastria - DAA <lou@aboutads.info>, Marc Groman - NAI <mgroman@networkadvertising.org> Subject: Re: action-407 proposed language - Section 5, User Preferences > > Chris, > > This is your text proposal. I'm not going to interpret it for you. > > If the language is vague in its application to one of the most common and > controversial implementations, that seems like a substantial drawback. > > Jonathan > > > > > On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Chris Mejia wrote: > >> >> Jonathan, >> >> If you believe that to be the case, please feel free to submit your use-case >> analysis for IE10 in context of this text. I think that might be useful, so >> we may examine how this proposed text might be interpreted. >> >> Chris >> >> >> Chris Mejia | Digital Supply Chain Solutions | Ad Technology Group | >> Interactive Advertising Bureau - IAB | chris.mejia@iab.net >> >> >> From: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu> >> Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 11:30 AM >> To: Chris Mejia - IAB <chris.mejia@iab.net> >> Cc: W3C DNT Working Group Mailing List <public-tracking@w3.org>, Alan Chapell >> - Chapell Associates <achapell@chapellassociates.com>, Mike Zaneis - IAB >> <mike@iab.net>, "Nicholas \"Nick\" Doty - W3C" <npdoty@w3.org>, Lou Mastria - >> DAA <lou@aboutads.info>, Marc Groman - NAI <mgroman@networkadvertising.org> >> Subject: Re: action-407 proposed language - Section 5, User Preferences >> >> Chris, >> >> Would Internet Explorer 10 be in compliance with this language? >> >> Thanks, >> Jonathan >> >> >> On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Chris Mejia wrote: >>> >>> Alan Chapell and I worked on this, per our "homework" assignment on the >>> working group call 2-weeks ago. Here's our proposal below. Please note >>> that I'm not crazy about 5.1.4, the "G flag" idea, but Alan had support for >>> this idea from folks he's worked with, so we are leaving it in for further >>> discussion. >>> >>> C. Mejia >>> >>> --- >>> >>> 5. User Preferences >>> >>> Any agent or program that sets or alters a userıs tracking preference >>> expression MUST obtain express and informed consent from the individual user >>> before setting or altering the setting of controls that affect the userıs >>> tracking preference expression. The controls MUST communicate the individual >>> user's preference in accordance with the [TRACKING-DNT >>> <http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html# >>> bib-TRACKING-DNT> ] recommendation. >>> >>> >>> >>> 5.1 Tracking Preference Choices. User agents or programs that set or alter >>> tracking preference expression choices for users (the ³agent² or ³agents²) >>> MUST follow the following user interface guidelines: >>> >>> 1. The agent must be the party responsible for determining the user >>> experience by which a tracking preference is controlled; >>> >>> 2. The agent MUST ensure that tracking preference choices are >>> communicated to users clearly and accurately and are shown at the time and >>> place the tracking preference choice is made available to a user or altered; >>> >>> 3. The agent SHOULD ensure that the tracking preference choices >>> accurately describe the parties to whom DNT applies and SHOULD make >>> available explanatory text to provide more detailed information about DNTıs >>> operational effects on the user. >>> >>> 4. Agents that donıt meet the criteria listed in 5.1.3 MUST include a >>> flag "G" that signals that a Agent is unable to comply with these >>> guidelines. >>> >>> >>> >>> 5.2 Tracking Preference Exception. Agents or programs offering tracking >>> preference expression choices to users, or that alter the tracking >>> preference expression of a user(s), MUST comply with these user interface >>> guidelines: >>> >>> 1. web sites are responsible for determining the user experience by which >>> a tracking exception is controlled; >>> >>> 2. sites offering tracking exceptions MUST ensure that tracking >>> exception choices are communicated to users clearly and accurately and shown >>> at the time and place the tracking preference exception is made available to >>> a user; >>> >>> 3. sites SHOULD ensure that the tracking preference choices accurately >>> describe the parties to whom DNT applies and SHOULD make available >>> explanatory text to provide more detailed information about DNT >>> functionality. >>> >>> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 16:47:43 UTC