Re: summary: data retention call

On 2013-06-04 14:08, Alan Chapell wrote:

> As was mentioned a number of times on the call, there are 
> confidentiality
> and resource allocation issues associated with the level of detail you 
> are
> requesting. And when one of the rationale behind asking for this level 
> of
> detail is the hope of offering some sort of consulting services to
> companies, I think we're well beyond the scope of the WG.

While sympathetic to commercial interests in confidentiality, 
transparency about data retention practices is crucial to get the 
informed consent necessary for DNT:0 signals. Unless I am confused about 
the nature of the disagreement here, this would seem like a no-brainer 
to me.



Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 12:35:22 UTC