- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 17:12:19 -0700
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: Tracking Protection Working Group <public-tracking@w3.org>
On May 30, 2012, at 17:03 , Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On May 30, 2012, at 4:54 PM, David Singer wrote: >> I think it means something like "I am aware of DNT but I am choosing not to send you a DNT (DNT:1) request", whereas absence of a DNT header might mean I am unaware of DNT or choose not to send any DNT header at all. > > Such a message would have no value, for anyone. Presumably, we have > a user granted exceptions mechanism in order to do something useful > once the exception is granted. If we can't say what that bit of > usefulness is, then we don't need an exception mechanism and the > spec gets a whole lot simpler. It means something, if only by contrast that it's not DNT:1. Other people may be getting DNT:1; you're not. From a behavioral point of view, you can behave as if you got not DNT header at all, except I would like to find confirmation that you saw my DNT:0 (so I can tell if you claim to have seen a DNT:0 when I don't think I sent it). What I am saying is that I think trying to read more into what you are permitted to do, than if no DNT was sent, is a tar-pit. David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2012 00:12:48 UTC