- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 16:57:09 +0200
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
On Monday 21 May 2012 16:19:31 David Singer wrote: > There is still a formal difference between "no header sent, our spec. does > not apply" and "dnt:0 sent, our spec. defines what that means"; however, > it may not be a practical difference The huge practical difference is whether you can use DNT as a consent mechanism also for first parties. No header sent has no (positive) semantics. DNT;0 means actual permission. We haven't defined the minimal boundaries of that permission. As it is a minimum, I would like to get feedback from the Advertisement and Analytics people (Shane, Roy) on what a good minimum description would be. (bullet points) Rigo
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 14:58:03 UTC