- From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 13:46:04 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
Hi Nick, I would like to coin the term inheritance instead of transitivity. I believe an object oriented approach to exceptions, like object oriented programming, is worth exploring. The relation between exceptions gives rise to hierarchy. Rob On 9-5-2012 7:44, Nicholas Doty wrote: > After some discussion of transitivity of exceptions on last week's call and some follow-up with Matthias, it sounds like there might be interest in specific exceptions (that might help with EU or other jurisdictions) for top-level third parties. For example, maybe a large site could more easily specify the ad networks or exchanges it works with in requesting an exception (such that those domains receive a DNT:0 opt-in signal) and then all further re-directs would also be excepted, because the further third-parties aren't using the data for any additional purposes (via some version of our Outsourcing exception, and perhaps fitting an EU "data processor" definition). > > Does this sound workable for interpretations of EU law? For site or browser implementers? > > Do we see other definitions of "transitivity of exceptions" that would be useful? Browsers could, for example, send DNT:0 to all resources that are re-directed from a request that was initiated with DNT:0, but that sounds both annoying to implement (for browser plug-ins, for example) and sometimes specifically not the intent of an exception (URL re-direction services, maybe). > > Thanks, > Nick > > (This isn't meant to duplicate Ian's action-194, though maybe it will be related.) >
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 11:46:33 UTC