RE: 5.2.2 Policy representation from JC Cannon on 2012-05-04 (public-tracking@w3.org from May 2012)

From: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 15:31:45 +0000
To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BB17D596C94A854E9EE4171D33BBCC810D4DBE@TK5EX14MBXC136.redmond.corp.microsoft.co>

Good point!

-----Original Message-----
From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org] 
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 8:30 AM
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: JC Cannon
Subject: Re: 5.2.2 Policy representation

On Friday 04 May 2012 15:18:09 JC Cannon wrote:
> Do we really want to mix P3P and DNT? Or are you saying this is one 
> option for defining the policy file?

Aren't we doing that already with the response file?

Rigo

Received on Friday, 4 May 2012 15:32:46 UTC