- From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 22:36:49 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4FA2EC61.7090709@blaeu.com>
Hi Nick, Ian, It is maybe a bit out of place to mention, but the point you raise on the mix of advertisers that received opt-out cookies or not brings back the short discussion I had with Travis on his auto-opt out solution for the whole dynamic ad-chain. To me it reads (site/*) for opt-outs. (See the thread 'DNT ad tag solution'). On 5-3-2012 22:27, Travis Pinnick (Truste) wrote: > your assumption is correct - if the DNT header is detected, the user > will receive opt-out cookies for all parties in the ad serving chain. > the implementation of the individual opt-out cookies is specific to > each ad entity - the opt-out manager simply passes the user's > preference to the given companies, therefore we don't control > specifics like cookie expiration dates. Isn't there anything in the passing-mechanism we can re-use for exceptions? Hope this thought helps, Rob >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org >> <mailto:npdoty@w3.org>> wrote: >> >> >> In the current self-regulatory opt-out cookie system the >> publishing site never gets an indication of whether one of its >> advertisers received an opt-out signal (unless it communicates on >> the server side) and the site may have a mix of advertisers that >> received opt-out cookies or not. >> >> Hope this helps, >> Nick >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 20:37:16 UTC