Thursday, 31 May 2012
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-148: What does DNT:0 mean? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: action-190
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-149: Compliance section for user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-148: What does DNT:0 mean? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: ISSUE-116: How can we build a JS DOM property which doesn't allow inline JS to receive mixed signals?
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-148: What does DNT:0 mean? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-149: Compliance section for user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
Wednesday, 30 May 2012
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-148: What does DNT:0 mean? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- tracking-ISSUE-150: DNT conflicts from multiple user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: Support for ISSUE 143 - EDUCATED Consumer Choice Should Be REQUIRED
- Industry Hosted Education/Feedback Event on DNT June 12th in NYC - W3C Working Group Invite
- RE: action-190
- Re: action-190
- Re: action-190
- action-195: Clarify action items needed for issue-65
- Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- ISSUE-116: How can we build a JS DOM property which doesn't allow inline JS to receive mixed signals?
- Re: minutes (was Re: Agenda for May 16, 2012 DNT WG Call)
- Dutch cookie clause
- ACTION-179 -- Shane Wiley to draft section on seriousness of the request for a user-granted exception (with ninja) -- due 2012-04-19 -- OPEN
- RE: action-190
- agenda: 30 May 2012 call
- tracking-ISSUE-149: Compliance section for user agents [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: action-190
- Re: action-190
- Re: action-190
- Re: Updated Server Response Section of TPE
- RE: Transitive third party exceptions
Tuesday, 29 May 2012
- Re: action-190
- tracking-ISSUE-148: What does DNT:0 mean? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- action-190
- Re: Updated Server Response Section of TPE
- Re: Transitive third party exceptions
- Re: REVISED Actions 176 (and dup. 183), also merged Shane's text and added Remove APIs
Friday, 25 May 2012
- RE: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- RE: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- ACTION-203 : Text for transitive model
- Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- ACTION-185: Draft specific field proposal for optional auditors
Thursday, 24 May 2012
- Leaving...
- Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
Wednesday, 23 May 2012
- Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- Support for ISSUE 143 - EDUCATED Consumer Choice Should Be REQUIRED
- Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection
- Apologies
- Re: REVISED Actions 176 (and dup. 183), also merged Shane's text and added Remove APIs
- Re: Agenda for May 23, 2012 DNT WG Call V01
- Re: ACTION-202 Alternative to explicit/explicit API
- Re: Agenda for May 16, 2012 DNT WG Call
- Re: Agenda for May 16, 2012 DNT WG Call
- Re: ACTION-202 Alternative to explicit/explicit API
- Re: Agenda for May 16, 2012 DNT WG Call
Tuesday, 22 May 2012
- Agenda for May 23, 2012 DNT WG Call V01
- ACTION-202 Alternative to explicit/explicit API
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-147: Transporting Consent via the Exception / DNT mechanisms [Global Considerations]
- Updated Server Response Section of TPE
- REVISED Actions 176 (and dup. 183), also merged Shane's text and added Remove APIs
Monday, 21 May 2012
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-147: Transporting Consent via the Exception / DNT mechanisms [Global Considerations]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-147: Transporting Consent via the Exception / DNT mechanisms [Global Considerations]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-147: Transporting Consent via the Exception / DNT mechanisms [Global Considerations]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-147: Transporting Consent via the Exception / DNT mechanisms [Global Considerations]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-147: Transporting Consent via the Exception / DNT mechanisms [Global Considerations]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-147: Transporting Consent via the Exception / DNT mechanisms [Global Considerations]
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
Friday, 18 May 2012
Wednesday, 16 May 2012
- Re: Transitive third party exceptions
- RE: Transitive third party exceptions
- action-181, make language consistent, done (I claim)
- RE: ACTION-175: Draft API method for sites to remove, a la removeTrackingException()
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-147: Transporting Consent via the Exception / DNT mechanisms [Global Considerations]
- Re: transitivity of DNT exceptions
- Re: Actions 183 and 176 (which seem to be the same)
- Re: Actions 183 and 176 (which seem to be the same)
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-147: Transporting Consent via the Exception / DNT mechanisms [Global Considerations]
- Re: ACTION-175: Draft API method for sites to remove, a la removeTrackingException()
Tuesday, 15 May 2012
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-147: Transporting Consent via the Exception / DNT mechanisms [Global Considerations]
- Apologies
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-147: Transporting Consent via the Exception / DNT mechanisms [Global Considerations]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-147: Transporting Consent via the Exception / DNT mechanisms [Global Considerations]
- RE: ACTION-177: Add an API to let a site request a web-wide exception
- Re: ACTION-177: Add an API to let a site request a web-wide exception
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-147: Transporting Consent via the Exception / DNT mechanisms [Global Considerations]
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-147: Transporting Consent via the Exception / DNT mechanisms [Global Considerations]
- ACTION-175: Draft API method for sites to remove, a la removeTrackingException()
- Re: transitivity of DNT exceptions
- Re: Agenda for May 16, 2012 DNT WG Call
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs [a proposed resolution to ISSUE-140]
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Summary of Discussions on user-granted Exceptions [consensus check on ISSUE-129 and ISSUE-130]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-147: Transporting Consent via the Exception / DNT mechanisms [Global Considerations]
- Re: Call for feedback on hybrid URI/header proposal
- Re: Agenda for May 16, 2012 DNT WG Call
- ACTION-177: Add an API to let a site request a web-wide exception
Monday, 14 May 2012
- RE: Agenda for May 16, 2012 DNT WG Call
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: transitivity of DNT exceptions
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Agenda for May 16, 2012 DNT WG Call
- Call for feedback on hybrid URI/header proposal
- tracking-ISSUE-147: Transporting Consent via the Exception / DNT mechanisms [Global Considerations]
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- RE: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- RE: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- RE: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- RE: Summary of Discussions on user-granted Exceptions [consensus check on ISSUE-129 and ISSUE-130]
- RE: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Summary of Discussions on user-granted Exceptions [consensus check on ISSUE-129 and ISSUE-130]
- Re: transitivity of DNT exceptions
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs [a proposed resolution to ISSUE-140]
- RE: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Summary of Discussions on user-granted Exceptions [consensus check on ISSUE-129 and ISSUE-130]
- Re: transitivity of DNT exceptions
- Re: Actions 183 and 176 (which seem to be the same)
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Re: Tracking Preference Expression Spec Suggestion
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- RE: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- RE: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
Sunday, 13 May 2012
Saturday, 12 May 2012
- tracking-ISSUE-146: Well-known URIs and maintainability for large sites [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- tracking-ISSUE-145: Attribute-set for the well-known URI [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
Friday, 11 May 2012
Thursday, 10 May 2012
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- RE: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: Media Access (ACTION-197)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- RE: Media Access (ACTION-197)
Wednesday, 9 May 2012
- Media Access (ACTION-197)
- RE: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- RE: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: Transitive third party exceptions
- Re: Transitive third party exceptions
- Re: transitivity of DNT exceptions
- RE: W3C F2F logistics for Bellevue, WA
- Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- Re: Well known URIs and large sites
- Re: Transitive third party exceptions
- Re: Transitive third party exceptions
- Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- Re: Well known URIs and large sites
- Transitive third party exceptions
- Well known URIs and large sites
- Re: transitivity of DNT exceptions
- agenda 9 May 2012
- Re: Identifying yourself to Zakim for teleconferences
- transitivity of DNT exceptions
Tuesday, 8 May 2012
- RE:Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- RE: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- RE: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- RE: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- RE: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- RE: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- RE: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- RE: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- RE: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
Monday, 7 May 2012
- RE: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- RE: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: 5.2.2 Policy representation
- Re: 5.2.2 Policy representation
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: Actions 183 and 176 (which seem to be the same)
- Article from NYT on tracking
- Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- Re: 5.2.2 Policy representation
Sunday, 6 May 2012
- RE: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- Re: Actions 183 and 176 (which seem to be the same)
- Re: Actions 183 and 176 (which seem to be the same)
- Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
Saturday, 5 May 2012
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: 5.2.2 Policy representation
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Re: ACTION-169 ISSUE-61 same-party relations
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
Friday, 4 May 2012
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- RE: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Re: 5.2.2 Policy representation
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- RE: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: An alternative to site-specific user granted exceptions (Issue-111)
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-144: User-granted Exceptions: Constraints on user agent behavior while granting and for future requests? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- RE: 5.2.2 Policy representation
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Re: 5.2.2 Policy representation
- RE: 5.2.2 Policy representation
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Actions 183 and 176 (which seem to be the same)
- Re: W3C F2F logistics for Bellevue, WA
- Re: W3C F2F logistics for Bellevue, WA
- Re: ACTION-169 ISSUE-61 same-party relations
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: ACTION-169 ISSUE-61 same-party relations
- 5.2.2 Policy representation
- ACTION-169 ISSUE-61 same-party relations
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
Thursday, 3 May 2012
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- RE: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- RE: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- RE: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
Wednesday, 2 May 2012
- tracking-ISSUE-144: User-granted Exceptions: Constraints on user agent behavior while granting and for future requests? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-143 (Reciprocal Consent): Activating a Tracking Preference must require explicit, informed consent from a user [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- RE: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: Initial feedback on the well-known URI Proposal
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: W3C F2F logistics for Bellevue, WA
- RE: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- RE: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- RE: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- RE: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190)
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: W3C F2F logistics for Bellevue, WA
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- RE: W3C F2F logistics for Bellevue, WA
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- Identifying yourself to Zakim for teleconferences
- Minutes backlog
- Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
Tuesday, 1 May 2012
- Agenda for 02 May, 2012 call
- Re: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- RE: ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions
- RE: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs
- Re: explicit-explicit exception pairs