- From: イアンフェッティ <ifette@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 14:45:28 -0800
- To: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
- Cc: Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>, Matthias Schunter <mts@zurich.ibm.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAF4kx8dENpswj5ywNKLS0-Kxh84LzBig4jXuy5Vv0sMOGZvSdA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jonathan, The current charter is through 31 July 2012. My crystal ball is notoriously inaccurate (sadly), but I personally don't believe the spec will be in "Rec" state by 31 July. Thus, I had assumed there would be a re-chartering. I realize the current milestone specifies that we should be at CR in April, PR in May, and Rec in June, but given my experience I personally believe that to be unlikely, which I believe I have stated previously. -Ian On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu> wrote: > Ian, > > Clarifying question: Has there been some discussion of rechartering the > group? Or are you just referring to what you think is necessary to > implement the new process? > > Thanks, > Jonathan > > On Mar 7, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote: > > I see the discussion of the process, I also see concerns. I don't see any > resolution recorded or any vote. > > I will also note that the charter of this group specifically says > > "As explained in the Process Document (section 3.3), this group will seek > to make decisions when there is consensus. When the Chair puts a question > and observes dissent, after due consideration of different opinions, the > Chair should record a decision (possibly after a formal vote) and any > objections, and move on. > > This charter is written in accordance with Section 3.4, Votes of the W3C > Process Document and includes no voting procedures beyond what the Process > Document requires." > > Section 3.4 of the W3C process document is quite specific about voting > requirements, and our charter specifically states no procedure beyond what > the W3C process document requires are adopted by the group. > > This seems like a significant change to the charter of the group which > should wait for the rechartering discussion. > > -Ian > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org> wrote: > >> Discussion of the new process, with links to Matthias' slides and >> Matthias' conclusion that we have agreement are in the Process section of >> the minutes from January 26th. >> >> http://www.w3.org/2012/01/26-dnt-minutes.html#item01 >> >> Thanks, >> Nick >> >> On Mar 7, 2012, at 1:32 PM, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote: >> >> Matthias, >> >> Can you please point to a point in the minutes of the Brussels f2f where >> this policy was agreed upon? >> >> -Ian >> >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Matthias Schunter <mts@zurich.ibm.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi Team, >>> >>> >>> we've managed to put the revised decision process in writing: >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/decision-policy.html >>> >>> This process has been agreed upon at our Brussels meeting and we >>> started using it in the meantime. >>> >>> If you have questions, do not hesitate to drop us a line. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> matthias >>> >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 22:45:57 UTC