- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:32:50 +0100
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Cc: Matthias Schunter <mts@zurich.ibm.com>
On Monday 05 March 2012 14:24:59 Matthias Schunter wrote: > I agree with the principles put forward by Jeff that sites that want > to obtain an exemption should explain 'for what', 'why', ... I think this is an unnecessary complication and we should trust in the selective powers of Darwin here. As a consequence I'm more leaning towards the definition from Alan Chapell. We should not proscribe too many things, because otherwise, you would require a full P3P document to be sent over with your request. Suggestion (but I'm fine with Alan's too): If information is given, this information MUST be accurate. Services MAY indicate what information they collect for what purpose. To obtain consent by this mechanism, services MUST provide enough information to allow the user to make an informed choice. Rigo
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 09:33:14 UTC