Re: Initial feedback on the well-known URI Proposal

On Mar 6, 2012, at 4:13 AM, Shane Wiley wrote:

> The one choice that does appear to be off the table at this point (unless someone strongly disagrees) is Response Headers in isolation as this would take years before medium to small web sites would be able to support DNT then (would require standard web server systems to come with off-the-shelf support for Response Headers).  Agreed?

Not following, perhaps my mistake here. I should think that adding a response header to www.aleecia.com would be trivial for a competent developer, and that the code would be easy enough to have sample code for copy&paste cargo cult programming for the non-competent programmers (read: people like me.) It might take longer to get PHP installed, updated, and running… 

What am I missing? Where is this hard?

	Aleecia