W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > July 2012

ACTION-200 (text for ISSUE-84)

From: イアンフェッティ <ifette@google.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:24:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAF4kx8d0X3sWQ_iLVyUnZ==yCOO9o3vfK4+04Zd5rnp8HCvxDA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
I believe this got assigned to me because the group was unhappy with the
original draft at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Feb/0609.html that
Tom proposed as an update, but I'll admit my memory is a bit fuzzy.

Rather than going down and specifying the exact API / IDL, I'd like to try
to first specify use cases and see if we agree on that..

A frame should be able to discover:

a) whether it received DNT:0 or DNT:1
b) whether a user has approved a site-wide ("this-site/*") exception for
the current frame

If we go further, we get into fingerprinting risks, and it also depends on
whether we're supporting finer grained exceptions...
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 15:25:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:53 UTC