W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > July 2012

Re: Prototype of Do Not Track Exceptions (ISSUE-151)

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:03:25 +0200
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: "TOUBIANA, VINCENT (VINCENT)" <Vincent.Toubiana@alcatel-lucent.com>, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <9864324.MRNHAg0Q2L@hegel.sophia.w3.org>

if we reject "on by default" on the basis that it allegedly doesn't 
reflect a user choice, it is even less a user choice if a tool can 
just spawn DNT:1 requests and reject exception requests. 

This will only serve some short-term success for alleged baseline 
protection for the US market only. Not good enough IMHO as it also 
removes the DNT system as a communication system. Without exceptions 
or only one answer (no), this isn't really a tool for the user. But 
what if we create a tool that sends "yes" on every exception 
request? Would that be compliant too?


On Monday 02 July 2012 13:27:45 TOUBIANA, VINCENT wrote:
> 2): I think  it should be enough for the UA to "be able to handle
> an exception request" (as forumlated in Issue-151). Thus the UA
> could be designed to accept (or reject) all exception requests
> and still be compliant.
Received on Monday, 2 July 2012 13:04:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:52 UTC