- From: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:38:50 +0000
- To: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>, W3C DNT Working Group Mailing List <public-tracking@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:39:46 UTC
Could you describe a scenario where the service provider is not on HTTP? How would it send a response I the first place? Are you talking about offline scenarios? Thanks, JC From: Jonathan Mayer [mailto:jmayer@stanford.edu] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 9:36 AM To: W3C DNT Working Group Mailing List Subject: Re: Service Provider Status (ISSUE-137) A related design decision: What about service providers that aren't at visible via HTTP? I don't think we have consensus on this yet. On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Jonathan Mayer wrote: Some possible status ambiguities for service providers. All are solvable with trivial engineering. -If a service provider is using its own domain: -Is the entity a first party, third party, or service provider? -Which party is it providing outsourcing services to? (Might be multiple parties in different roles.) -If a service provider is using a different party's domain (e.g. a CNAMEd analytics service): -Who is the service provider?
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:39:46 UTC