W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > August 2012

Re: action-231, issue-153 requirements on other software that sets DNT headers

From: Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:53:25 -0400
Message-ID: <84302fa9-cbc9-43f7-8809-8c70e40ac3bf@blur>
To: public-tracking@w3.org
<cut off>

(c)learly-intentioned statement of will.  I think either standard is  
defensible if applied consistently, but to apply the weaker standard just to  
exceptions (as you have consistently argued) is indefensible.

(Sorry, perils of debating DNT on handheld at the playground.)

Sent via mobile, please excuse curtness and typos

-----Original message-----
From: Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Sent: Thu, Aug 23, 2012 21:48:11 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: action-231, issue-153 requirements on other software that sets   
DNT  headers
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2012 21:53:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:38:54 UTC