Re: action-231, issue-153 requirements on other software that sets DNT headers

<cut off>

(c)learly-intentioned statement of will.  I think either standard is  
defensible if applied consistently, but to apply the weaker standard just to  
exceptions (as you have consistently argued) is indefensible.

(Sorry, perils of debating DNT on handheld at the playground.)

Sent via mobile, please excuse curtness and typos

-----Original message-----
From: Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Sent: Thu, Aug 23, 2012 21:48:11 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: action-231, issue-153 requirements on other software that sets   
DNT  headers