Monday, 31 October 2011
- RE: TPE Document, S2.3 P1
- Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1
- exclude comma from DNT extension syntax
- Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1
- ISSUE 17: Data use by 1st Party
- Re: Issue-4
- ISSUE-97: Re-direction, shortened URLs, click analytics -- what kind of tracking is this?
- Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1
- Fwd: TPAC updates (name tags, t-shirts, lunch BOF tables)
- Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1
- Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1
- Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1
- Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1
- Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1
- Re: ISSUE-84: Do we need a JavaScript API / DOM property for client-side js access to Do Not Track status?
- ISSUE-96: The doNotTrack attribute should mirror the value of the header (potentially empty, extensions, etc.)
- TPE Document S3
- RE: TPE Document, S2.3 P1
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user?
- RE: TPE Document, S2.3 P1
- TPE Document, S2.3 P1
- Re: Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status
- Call-in for Tracking Protection second face-to-face
- Re: Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status
- Re: Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status
- Re: Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status
- Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests
Sunday, 30 October 2011
- Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests
- RE: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests
- Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests
- Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
Saturday, 29 October 2011
- Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests
- Re: Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Frozen Compliance doc
Friday, 28 October 2011
- Re: Issue-4
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80]
- Re: Issue-4
- Re: Issue-4
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html
- Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html
- Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html
- Re: Draft Language on Interaction with Third-Party Content
- Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html
- Re: Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status
- Re: Draft Language on Interaction with Third-Party Content
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80]
- Re: Issue-4
- Re: Draft Language on Interaction with Third-Party Content
- Re: Proposed definition of 1st parties
- RE: Proposed definition of 1st parties
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80]
Thursday, 27 October 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Friday, 28 October 2011
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server?
- Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80]
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: Draft Language on Interaction with Third-Party Content
- Re: Issue-4
- frozen version of TPE spec for Santa Clara meeting
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: Straw poll: dinner Monday 31 October
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: Draft Language on Interaction with Third-Party Content
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80]
- Re: Issue-4
- Re: Issue-4
Thursday, 27 October 2011
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: Draft Language on Interaction with Third-Party Content
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server?
- RE: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80]
- Re: Issue-4
- Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?
- Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80]
- Re: DNT and search revenues
- Re: DNT and search revenues
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: Summary of compliance issues raised
- Re: DNT and search revenues
- Re: Issue-4
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: Does DNT apply only to 3rd parties, and cross-site tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: Issue-4
- DNT and search revenues
- Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80]
- Re: Does DNT apply only to 3rd parties, and cross-site tracking?
- Re: Does DNT apply only to 3rd parties, and cross-site tracking?
- Issue 5 and First and Third parties
Wednesday, 26 October 2011
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure
- Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html
- RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: Issue-4
- Straw poll: dinner Monday 31 October
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80]
- Re: Issue-4
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server?
- RE: Comments on tracking-compliance.html
- Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html
- Re: Proposed definition of 1st parties
- Re: Issue-4
- Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html
- Issue-4
- RE: Proposed definition of 1st parties
- Fwd: Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93
- Re: Proposed definition of 1st parties
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure
- RE: Proposed definition of 1st parties
- Proposed definition of 1st parties
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure
- RE: Proposed First Party definition
- RE: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure
- RE: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure
- RE: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure
- Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure
- Input for TPE Discussion: Issue cleanup
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure
- Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html
- Does DNT apply only to 3rd parties, and cross-site tracking?
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure
Tuesday, 25 October 2011
- Re: Strawman documents, Santa Clara agenda, and the FPWD
- Re: Strawman documents, Santa Clara agenda, and the FPWD
Wednesday, 26 October 2011
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93
- RE: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93
- building consensus
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: Proposed First Party definition
- Re: Summary of compliance issues raised
- Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80]
- Summary of compliance issues raised
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93
- No DNT Call on 2011-11-02
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93
- Draft Language on Interaction with Third-Party Content
- Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html
- Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html
- Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html
- RE: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93
- RE: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93
- Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93
- Comments on tracking-compliance.html
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
Tuesday, 25 October 2011
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure
- Strawman compliance spec
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure
- Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93
- Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Agenda for Wednesday 2011-10-26 DNT Team Call
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- current state of tracking preference expression spec
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
Monday, 24 October 2011
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Strawman documents, Santa Clara agenda, and the FPWD
- tracking-ISSUE-94: Is "Do Not Track" the right name to use? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Fwd: Daylight Savings Time change
- Re: Proposed First Party definition
Sunday, 23 October 2011
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: agenda for wednesday call
- RE: Web Tracking: Facts on the Ground
Saturday, 22 October 2011
Friday, 21 October 2011
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-92: If data collection (even very specific with IP address, user agent, referrer) is time-limited, with very limited retention, is that still tracking?
- Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?
- Re: DISCUSSION: Selective Opt-in (chapter 5 of editors draft) [ISSUE-42, ISSUE-27, ISSUE-46]
- Re: Proposed First Party definition
- Re: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? [ISSUE-60]
- Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80]
- Re: Can we close ISSUE-42? I believe it to be largely superseded by ISSUE-43
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server?
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
Thursday, 20 October 2011
- RE: Web Tracking: Facts on the Ground
- Web Tracking: Facts on the Ground
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Agenda: Tracking Protection WG Meeting 2011-10-31 & 11-01
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
Wednesday, 19 October 2011
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Re: ISSUE-92: If data collection (even very specific with IP address, user agent, referrer) is time-limited, with very limited retention, is that still tracking?
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Next steps
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- Summary of progress on Issue 59
- tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
- RE: ISSUE-92: If data collection (even very specific with IP address, user agent, referrer) is time-limited, with very limited retention, is that still tracking?
- ISSUE-92: If data collection (even very specific with IP address, user agent, referrer) is time-limited, with very limited retention, is that still tracking?
- Regrets
- RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- agenda for wednesday call
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?
Tuesday, 18 October 2011
- RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
Sunday, 16 October 2011
Monday, 17 October 2011
- Participation and f2f registration
- Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?
- RE: DISCUSSION: Selective Opt-in (chapter 5 of editors draft) [ISSUE-42, ISSUE-27, ISSUE-46]
Sunday, 16 October 2011
- RE: DISCUSSION: Selective Opt-in (chapter 5 of editors draft) [ISSUE-42, ISSUE-27, ISSUE-46]
- RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: Proposed First Party definition
- RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?
- RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?
- RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?
- RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?
- RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?
- RE: Proposed First Party definition
- Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?
Saturday, 15 October 2011
- RE: Proposed First Party definition
- RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: Proposed First Party definition
- Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?
Friday, 14 October 2011
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format
- Re: Proposed First Party definition
- [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?
- Proposed First Party definition
- Re: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? [ISSUE-60]
- Re: Agenda for 2011-10-12 DNT Workgroup Meeting
Thursday, 13 October 2011
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? [ISSUE-60]
- Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
Wednesday, 12 October 2011
- Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80]
- DISCUSSION: Selective Opt-in (chapter 5 of editors draft) [ISSUE-42, ISSUE-27, ISSUE-46]
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- Can we close ISSUE-42? I believe it to be largely superseded by ISSUE-43
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking?
- RE: ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites.
- ISSUE-91: Might want prohibitions on first parties re-selling data to get around the intent of DNT
- RE: ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites.
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server?
- RE: Action 13 - Mandatory Server Response
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server?
- editor's draft for Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)
- Re: Action 13 - Mandatory Server Response
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server?
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server?
Tuesday, 11 October 2011
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server?
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server?
- tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server?
- FYI: TPAC discount registration extended through Friday, 21 October
- Re: ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites.
- Re: Agenda for 2011-10-12 DNT Workgroup Meeting
- Agenda for 2011-10-12 DNT Workgroup Meeting
- tracking-ISSUE-90 (caching): Interaction of DNT with caching and intermediaries [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Action 13 - Mandatory Server Response
- Re: Action 13 - Mandatory Server Response
Monday, 10 October 2011
- Re: Action 13 - Mandatory Server Response
- Re: Action 13 - Mandatory Server Response
- Action 13 - Mandatory Server Response
- Fwd: Hotel Update--Re: W3C Meeting: TPAC2011 - please register and book hotel
- RE: first parties
- Re: Agenda for 2011-10-05 TPWG call
- RE: first parties
Sunday, 9 October 2011
Friday, 7 October 2011
Saturday, 8 October 2011
- Re: ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites.
- Re: ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites.
Friday, 7 October 2011
- Re: first parties
- Re: first parties
- RE: first parties
- RE: first parties
- Re: first parties
- RE: first parties
Thursday, 6 October 2011
Friday, 7 October 2011
Thursday, 6 October 2011
- RE: first parties
- Registration for Santa Clara
- RE: first parties
- first parties
- RE: Proposed language for first-party websites
Wednesday, 5 October 2011
Thursday, 6 October 2011
- Re: ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites.
- RE: ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites.
- RE: From Shane
Wednesday, 5 October 2011
- Re: ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites.
- Re: From Shane
- Re: Fwd: Action 9 - Proposal for a DNT definition for 1st Parties
- Re: Action 8 - Proposal for a DNT definition for 3rd Parties
- ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites.
- Re: Action 8 - Proposal for a DNT definition for 3rd Parties
- From Shane
Tuesday, 4 October 2011
- Fwd: Action 9 - Proposal for a DNT definition for 1st Parties
- Action 8 - Proposal for a DNT definition for 3rd Parties
- Re: Proposed language for first-party websites
- Working Group calendar
- Agenda for 2011-10-04 TPWG call
- Response Headers [ISSUE-47,ISSUE-48,ISSUE-51,ISSUE-76,ISSUE-79,ISSUE-80,ISSUE-81,ISSUE-87]
- Definitions: 1st vs 3rd Party [ISSUE-10,ISSUE-14]
- Proposed language for first-party websites
- Proposed language for third-party outsourcing