Re: Request to close ISSUE-78

* Sid Stamm wrote:
>You and I agree here.  This is the point I was attempting to make:
>absence of the header should not at all be dictated by whatever
>specification we end up with.  Absence doesn't mean "track me" and it
>also doesn't mean "do not track me", it is simply a lack of information
>and should be treated as such.

Good. My point was that rather than saying "whatever society accepts
because the individual hasn't weighed in" the specification should say
nothing about it; that it's out of scope; that the protocol does not
address this; that you are on your own in interpreting this.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Thursday, 22 December 2011 00:34:54 UTC