- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:34:33 +0100
- To: Sid Stamm <sid@mozilla.com>
- Cc: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Tracking Protection Working Group WG <public-tracking@w3.org>
* Sid Stamm wrote: >You and I agree here. This is the point I was attempting to make: >absence of the header should not at all be dictated by whatever >specification we end up with. Absence doesn't mean "track me" and it >also doesn't mean "do not track me", it is simply a lack of information >and should be treated as such. Good. My point was that rather than saying "whatever society accepts because the individual hasn't weighed in" the specification should say nothing about it; that it's out of scope; that the protocol does not address this; that you are on your own in interpreting this. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2011 00:34:54 UTC