- From: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:56:40 -0800
- To: Matthias Schunter <mts@zurich.ibm.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Matthias, I support your desire to close on the other issues so far, but this particular issue appears to need more discussion as initial proposals offered more than one DNT header value to represent different "types" of DNT exception. - Shane -----Original Message----- From: Matthias Schunter [mailto:mts@zurich.ibm.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 9:49 AM To: public-tracking@w3.org Subject: Request to close ISSUE-78 Hi Team, As indicated during our 2011-11-30 telco, I'd like to move this issue from "Pending Review" to "Closed" during our 2011-12-21 telco. Regards, matthias ISSUE What is the difference between absence of DNT header and DNT = 0? PROPOSED LANGUAGE in FPWD: The DNT field-value sent by a user agent must begin with the character "1" (%x31) if DNT is enabled and there is not, to the user agent's knowledge, a specific exception for the origin server targeted by this request. If DNT is enabled and there is a specific exception for the target origin server via some mechanism understood by the user agent, then the DNT field-value sent by a user agent must begin with the character "0" (%x30).
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2011 16:57:43 UTC