Friday, 30 December 2011
Tuesday, 27 December 2011
Saturday, 24 December 2011
Friday, 23 December 2011
- Re: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user?
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88)
- Re: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user?
Thursday, 22 December 2011
- Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88)
- Proposed text for W3C Tracking Protection Compliance ISSUE-15
- RE: ACTION-31: Write up a proposal for a user-agent-managed site-specific exception
- Re: ACTION-31: Write up a proposal for a user-agent-managed site-specific exception
- Re: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user?
- RE: Issue-32, Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering
- RE: Issue-32, Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering
- Draft: Issue 31, Minimization - to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption? (conditional exemptions)
- Issue-22, Still have "operational use" of data
- Re: Request to close ISSUE-78
- Re: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user?
- Re: Request to close ISSUE-78
- Re: Request to close ISSUE-78
- Re: Request to close ISSUE-78
- Re: Issue-32, Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering
Wednesday, 21 December 2011
- Re: Draft: Issue-6, What are the underlying concerns?
- Draft: Issue-6, What are the underlying concerns?
- Re: Value returned by navigator.doNotTrack
- ISSUE-108: Should/could the tracking preference expression be extended to other protocols beyond HTTP?
- RE: Draft: Issue-36, Should DNT opt-outs distinguish between behavioral targeting and other personalization?
- RE: Draft: Issue-36, Should DNT opt-outs distinguish between behavioral targeting and other personalization?
- Draft: Issue-36, Should DNT opt-outs distinguish between behavioral targeting and other personalization?
- RE: Issue-32, Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering
- RE: Issue-32, Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering
- Issue-32, Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- compliance drafts
- Re: Request to close ISSUE-81
- Re: Request to close ISSUE-78
- Re: Request to close ISSUE-81
- RE: Request to close ISSUE-78
- Re: Request to close ISSUE-78
- Re: Request to close ISSUE-81
- RE: Request to close ISSUE-78
Tuesday, 20 December 2011
- Re: Request to close ISSUE-78
- Re: Request to close ISSUE-81
- RE: Request to close ISSUE-78
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Fwd: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: Request to close ISSUE-78
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- RE: Request to close ISSUE-78
- RE: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: Request to close ISSUE-78
- Re: Move to close ISSUE-4
- Re: Request to close ISSUE-78
- Re: Move to close ISSUE-4
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- RE: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- RE: Should we treat 1st and 3rd parties differently?
- RE: Request to close ISSUE-78
- RE: Request to close ISSUE-78
- Proposed Agenda for 2011-12-21 TPWG call
- Request to close ISSUE-82
- Request to close ISSUE-84
- Request to close ISSUE-81
- Re: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user?
- Request to close ISSUE-78
- Request to close ISSUE-13
- Move to close ISSUE-4
- RE: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user?
- Re: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user?
- Re: Should we treat 1st and 3rd parties differently?
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- RE: Should we treat 1st and 3rd parties differently?
Monday, 19 December 2011
- Re: Should we treat 1st and 3rd parties differently?
- Should we treat 1st and 3rd parties differently?
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Some URL issues
- RE: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user?
- tracking-ISSUE-106: Response header on cacheable objects? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- tracking-ISSUE-107: Exact format of the response header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]
- Re: Issue-95: User Setting DNT Response (Draft)
- Re: ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user?
- ACTION-31: Write up a proposal for a user-agent-managed site-specific exception
Friday, 16 December 2011
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- RE: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- RE: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- RE: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
Thursday, 15 December 2011
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- RE: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- [Issue-98] Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir
- RE: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- [Issue-98] Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir
- RE: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- RE: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- RE: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- RE: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- Re: Article: New online advertising guidance sets out restrictions for tracking
- Re: Article: New online advertising guidance sets out restrictions for tracking
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- RE: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
Wednesday, 14 December 2011
- Re: Issue-95: User Setting DNT Response (Draft)
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- RE: Issue-95: User Setting DNT Response (Draft)
- Re: High-level text on third-party responsibilities (ACTION-38, ISSUE-19)
- Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party
- RE: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- RE: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: High-level text on third-party responsibilities (ACTION-38, ISSUE-19)
- Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data
- Re: High-level text on third-party responsibilities (ACTION-38, ISSUE-19)
- RE: High-level text on third-party responsibilities (ACTION-38, ISSUE-19)
- Agenda for 2011-12-14 call
Tuesday, 13 December 2011
Monday, 12 December 2011
- RE: [ISSUE-31] Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption?
- Re: [ISSUE-31] Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption?
- RE: [ISSUE-31] Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption?
- Re: [ISSUE-31] Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption?
- Re: [ISSUE-31] Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption?
- [ISSUE-31] Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption?
- RE: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking?
Sunday, 11 December 2011
- Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking?
Saturday, 10 December 2011
- Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking?
- Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking?
- [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking?
Friday, 9 December 2011
Thursday, 8 December 2011
- Re: Article: New online advertising guidance sets out restrictions for tracking
- Re: Article: New online advertising guidance sets out restrictions for tracking
Friday, 9 December 2011
- Re: High-level text on third-party responsibilities (ACTION-38, ISSUE-19)
- Re: High-level text on third-party responsibilities (ACTION-38, ISSUE-19)
Thursday, 8 December 2011
- Re: Article: New online advertising guidance sets out restrictions for tracking
- Re: Article: New online advertising guidance sets out restrictions for tracking
- Re: High-level text on third-party responsibilities (ACTION-38, ISSUE-19)
- Re: Article: New online advertising guidance sets out restrictions for tracking
- RE: High-level text on third-party responsibilities (ACTION-38, ISSUE-19)
Wednesday, 7 December 2011
- Re: Article: New online advertising guidance sets out restrictions for tracking
- Re: Article: New online advertising guidance sets out restrictions for tracking
- Re: Article: New online advertising guidance sets out restrictions for tracking
- Re: High-level text on third-party responsibilities (ACTION-38, ISSUE-19)
- Prototyping Category specific exception
- upcoming calls
- RE: High-level text on third-party responsibilities (ACTION-38, ISSUE-19)
- High-level text on third-party responsibilities (ACTION-38, ISSUE-19)
- Re: Article: New online advertising guidance sets out restrictions for tracking
- Re: Article: New online advertising guidance sets out restrictions for tracking
- Article: New online advertising guidance sets out restrictions for tracking
- Re: Compliance issues
- Compliance issues
Tuesday, 6 December 2011
Monday, 5 December 2011
Sunday, 4 December 2011
Saturday, 3 December 2011
- Next steps on compliance issues
- Hotels
- Re: Proposed Agenda for 2011-11-30 TPWG call
- Re: DNT:1 and HTTP Referrers
Friday, 2 December 2011
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations
- RE: DNT:1 and HTTP Referrers
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations; Issue-5 Definition of Tracking
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations; Issue-5 Definition of Tracking
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations; Issue-5 Definition of Tracking
Thursday, 1 December 2011
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations; Issue-5 Definition of Tracking
- Re: DNT:1 and HTTP Referrers
- Re: DNT:1 and HTTP Referrers
- RE: DNT:1 and HTTP Referrers
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations
- DNT:1 and HTTP Referrers
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations; Issue-5 Definition of Tracking
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations
- RE: FW: Issue-95: User Setting DNT Response (Draft)