Rigo,
I am really a bit confused to have a meeting to reflect draft legislation. If we want to go down the route, we should then go through all potential scenarios that are on the table. Or postpone the meeting, until the legislation is past.
I have echoed concerns from Shane and others on this point and I'm not sure I want to participate in speculations.
Kind regards,
Kimon
----- Reply message -----
From: "Rigo Wenning" <rigo@w3.org>
To: "Chris Mejia" <chris.mejia@iab.net>
Cc: "'public-tracking-international@w3.org'" <public-tracking-international@w3.org>, "'peter@peterswire.net'" <peter@peterswire.net>, "'tlr@w3.org'" <tlr@w3.org>, "Mike Zaneis (IAB US)" <mike@iab.net>, "'lou@aboutads.info'" <lou@aboutads.info>, "'mgroman@networkadvertising.org'" <mgroman@networkadvertising.org>
Subject: Agenda: Global considerations F2F meeting 11-12 Berlin
Date: Sun, Feb 24, 2013 9:12 pm
Chris,
are you suggesting to change one agenda item to talk about the APEC
enforcement agreement? Can you point me to interested stakeholders from
Asia? That would be great.
Of course this will start off with the European considerations as the
agenda is dictated by the Draft EU Regulation and the need for a user
control mechanism that could work and get the debate to a higher level,
get usability considerations into the debate etc.
W3C has a host in Japan and one in China. Asia is normally rather a
follower in the area of data protection. Once the dust has settled a bit
over the EU considerations, we will take into account the Asian market.
Australia is special. My friend Malcolm Crompton was federal data
commissioner there. He urged me to take the APEC guidelines on board.
So there are plans, but there is little time. I'm grateful for all
possibilities to get more involvement from Asia that does not involve me
making things personally, as I have too long a task-list to be really
effective getting it off the ground.
--Rigo
On Sunday 24 February 2013 18:50:10 Chris Mejia wrote:
> Since this workshop is entitled "Global Considerations" I'm Just
> wondering how POVs from Africa, Asia, Pan Pacific/Oceana (including
> Australia and New Zealand) and South America are going to be
> represented here? From the agenda, I'd recommend re-titling this
> particular workshop as "European Considerations" or "Western
> Considerations" to be more representative of the actual agenda,
> participation and motive. Otherwise, Rigo, can you please outline
> what true global outreach W3C has done (beyond the US and Europe) to
> assemble this meeting and it's agenda? I'm not being cheeky, at all.
> If this is to be a true "global standard" then I dare say that W3C
> still has quite a bit of work to do in assembling a truly global set
> of stake holders.