- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:23:44 +0100
- To: public-tracking-international@w3.org
- Cc: 'Thomas Roessler - W3C' <tlr@w3.org>, Kimon Zorbas <vp@iabeurope.eu>, Bill Scannell <bill@scannell.org>
Now, please register if you want to attend the F2F meeting by filling out the following WBS Form: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/49311/tpwgglobalberlin2013/ For planning reasons, please do so as soon as possible. As soon as I have more details on the location I will update you. I have some suggestions for the Agenda, but so far I have only very few feedback. This few will make the Agenda, if you do not have your own suggestions --Rigo On Thursday 14 February 2013 03:12:55 Rigo Wenning wrote: > Hi all, > > thanks to Frank, we have a room now at the Telekom Labs in Berlin. > Please don't hesitate to send me agenda items if you don't want to end > up with a Rigo's Agenda only. > > On Monday 04 February 2013 16:03:38 Rigo Wenning wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > we had 11-13 March as target dates. I heard Viney complain and argue > > against 12-13 March, but 11-12 would work. We only need a big > > maximun > > of one and a half day. > > > > So my suggestion is to fix the date now for 11-12 March in Berlin. > > The Agenda (to be detailed) will not start before noon, so > > everybody can arrive in the morning (even those from abroad with > > the earlier planes) > > > > It looks like Kimon still has trouble securing a room for the > > meeting, so I started a backup-plan as W3C has offices in Berlin > > (via DFKI). I'm currently investigating those. There are still > > other > > possibilities. > > > > So unless I hear loud complaints until tomorrow EOB, the meeting > > will > > be 11-12 March in Berlin. Details for room and agenda will follow. > > The main points of the Agenda that are relevant to the discussion of > > our specifications are already in my introduction email: > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking- > > international/2012Nov/0000.html > > > > If we want to, we could additionally talk about the TPWG's relation > > to the ongoing discussion about the new EU privacy regulation and > > what it means for us. > > > > Also, the javascript API has to be scrutinized whether it works for > > the goals we want to achieve in a regulated environment. > > > > Of course, additional suggestions for the agenda are welcome. > > > > Best, > > > > Rigo
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 12:24:11 UTC