- From: CVS User npdoty <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 06:54:43 +0000
- To: public-tracking-commit@w3.org
Update of /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts
In directory gil:/tmp/cvs-serv4941
Modified Files:
tracking-compliance.html
Log Message:
harmonize language with CfO decision on issue-170; removing issue block
--- /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html 2014/10/01 06:49:47 1.124
+++ /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html 2014/10/01 06:54:43 1.125
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@
<section id="first-party-compliance">
<h3>First Party Compliance</h3>
<p>
- With respect to a given user action, a first party to that action which receives a <code>DNT:1</code> signal MAY collect and use data received from those network interactions. This includes customizing content, services and advertising with respect to those user actions.
+ With respect to a given user action, a first party to that action which receives a <code>DNT:1</code> signal MAY collect, retain and use data received from those network interactions. This includes customizing content, services and advertising with respect to those user actions.
</p>
<aside class="example">
<p>
@@ -304,7 +304,6 @@
A first party to a given user action MAY elect to follow the rules defined under this recommendation for third parties.
</p>
<p class="note">Given WG decision on ISSUE-241, how should a first party to an action indicate to the user that it is electing to follow third-party rules? Should we suggest using "N" or some other tracking status code?</p>
- <p class="issue" data-number="170" title="Definition of and what/whether limitations around data append and first parties"></p>
</section>
<section id="third-party-compliance">
<h3>Third Party Compliance</h3>
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2014 06:54:44 UTC